1. Home
  2. Knowledge Base
  3. Getting Started
  4. FAQs on building a stock portfolio
  1. Home
  2. Knowledge Base
  3. Using PrimeInvestor
  4. Prime Stocks
  5. FAQs on building a stock portfolio
  1. Home
  2. Knowledge Base
  3. Using PrimeInvestor
  4. FAQs on building a stock portfolio
  1. Home
  2. Knowledge Base
  3. Building & Managing portfolio
  4. FAQs on building a stock portfolio
  1. Home
  2. Knowledge Base
  3. Stocks
  4. FAQs on building a stock portfolio

FAQs on building a stock portfolio

Thank you PrimeInvestor subscribers, for attending and making our webinar on Building a Winning Stock Portfolio on February 27 a great success. We received a flood of thought-provoking questions at the end of our presentation which we couldn’t entirely answer. Here are a set of FAQs in which we address key queries for the benefit of the questioners as well as those who couldn’t stay back for the Q&A. 

I now have an equity MF portfolio. Should I invest in stocks? Should I invest out of the surplus I save every month or should I invest my one-time bonuses and other windfalls?

As we said in the webinar, building a winning stock portfolio requires you to devote a lot of time and effort to monitoring it and tracking events in the companies you own, Therefore, you should add direct stocks to your MF portfolio only if you can spare the time and effort. As you are starting off in a big bull market, you will need to have a minimum 7-year horizon to reap returns from a direct stock portfolio. It would be better to use your monthly surpluses after your MF investments and debt allocation to acquire stocks in phases.

Before investing your surpluses in equities, make sure you have essential elements in place like an emergency fund, life and health insurance to protect your wealth and secure your dependents. As timing makes a big difference to stock returns, it may be best not to invest a bonus or lumpsum in stocks at one go, as the timing may not be ideal. Park such money in a safe, ultra-short debt fund and move it into stocks when the prices are attractive.

Going by your views, stock investing seems to take full-time effort. What can people with other jobs do to learn it and build a portfolio?

You can read books and blogs on investing to start with. A few good books specifically for Indian investors are Parag Parikh’s Value Investing and Behavioral Finance, Stocks to Riches, Masterclass with Super Investors by Vishal Mittal and Saurabh Basrar and Thoughtful Investor by Basant Maheshwari. There are any number of books by accomplished global investors such as Peter Lynch, Pat Dorsey, Howard Marks and others that you can study too. 

Warren Buffett’s annual newsletters to Berkshire Hathaway shareholders offer a common sense perspective on stock investing. In the Indian context, blogs by the Fundoo Professor Sanjay Bakshi, Dr Vijay Malik and Valuepickr are some excellent ones to learn the basics of balance sheet analysis and stock selection. 

Dr Aswath Damodaran’s blog is excellent for more seasoned investors to learn how to value companies. You should get into the habit of reading business newspapers and magazines to track and to be able to dissect corporate actions that have a bearing on companies you own. When you start buying equities, start small. Do a dry run with a model portfolio before you move on to the real thing.

My investment advisor is asking me not to invest in stocks directly and suggests index funds only. How can I convince him that Prime Stocks are worth investing in?

Your advisor may believe that your temperament or goals do not lend themselves to direct stock investing. Or he may just be loath to lose a good mutual fund client 😊 Do find out the reason for his advice. If you are sure you are cut out for direct stock investing, you can use stocks to supplement your MF holdings. You can tell him that individuals have some advantages over MFs in equity investing. Direct stock investors can buy low and sell high, unlike investors in MFs who are influenced by actions of others, especially in open end funds. Individuals can invest in under-researched small and mid-caps with low liquidity or float, which institutions like MFs, owing to their size, can’t acquire.

What proportion of one’s wealth should be in a direct stock portfolio? How many stocks should I own?

We cannot give a one-size-fits-all answer to this question. Your financial advisor would be the best person to decide on what overall allocation between stocks, bonds, gold, real estate etc suits your risk profile and financial goals. However, broadly, your direct stock portfolio must be carved out of your equity allocation, which can be 30%, 50%, 60% or 75 % based on your life stage and risk appetite. 

Your equity allocation can be held through index funds, active equity funds and stocks. Index funds require very little intervention or tracking on your part and can be acquired through SIPs. Active equity funds require slightly more tracking but can be acquired through SIPs. Direct stocks will need continuous tracking and will need to be bought and sold at the right time for you to earn reasonable returns. You should therefore decide on your allocation to direct stocks within the equity portfolio, based on your ability to devote time and effort to doing this.  

While there are no hard rules on this, owning 12 to 30 stocks in your portfolio gives you adequate diversification with monitorability. Mutual funds in India usually have stock weights ranging from 5-10 per cent in their top holdings.

Read this article on Building a Stock Portfolio to know more.

Are there any thumb rules on the ideal sector weights one must own? Should one decide on sector weights first before picking stocks?

Professional investors such as fund managers who need to beat a benchmark tend to peg their sector weights to an index they are tracking. So if the Nifty has a 40% weight in financials they’ll decide to be overweight or underweight relative to the index depending on their views on the sector. 

While this is one approach to use, we believe that retail investors are likely to seek diversification more to reduce downside to their portfolios than to outperform an index. We think as a ballpark number, 20 percent can be the maximum weight to a single sector. While diversifying across sectors, do ensure you own sectors with different earnings drivers. 

For instance, if you own sectors such as consumer appliances or FMCGs which are a domestic economy play, also own sectors like IT or specialty chemicals which are a global play. If you own weights in consumer-facing sectors, also try and own weights in industrial or B2B sectors. If you own high-beta sectors that are very reliant on the economy’s performance like corporate banks, do balance this out with sectors like healthcare or diagnostics which perform in an economic downturn as well. 

No, it is not necessary to set sector weights before selecting stocks for your portfolio. Ideally, select stocks using a bottom-up process based on company financials and prospects. Then set sector caps to ensure that too many of your stock picks don’t come from the same sector.

How do I prepare an investment thesis?

Analyse a company and see if you identify at least five good fundamental reasons to buy the stock that take into account sector prospects, company performance within it, growth potential, sustainability of attributes like margins, ROE and ROCE and debt-equity. See if the valuation already prices the positives in. That’s your thesis.

Is it a good idea to do SIPs in stocks instead of making lumpsum investments? Should you buy stocks every month irrespective of valuation?

No, we think the SIP route is better suited to buying baskets of stocks, ready made portfolios (like smallcases) or equity funds rather than individual stocks. This is because timing is a big contributor to stock returns in the long run and SIPs tend to put your investments on autopilot. It is best to accumulate your stock positions in tranches based on whether the stock meets your buy price target. The close tracking and monitoring that your stock portfolio needs can also get neglected if you use SIPs. Do read this article to know why we don’t think SIPs are a good idea for direct stock investing.

If we have good long-term stock holdings, is it a good strategy to keep topping them up by adding big chunks on dips? Should we simply withdraw 3-5 years before a goal?

Yes if you’ve identified really good businesses that you’d love to own, it makes sense to start with a small position and add to it as the company’s performance meets your expectations or fulfils your thesis. Having the ideal valuation in mind and buying on dips when you get them is a good strategy. Yes, you should start liquidating an equity portfolio with a target date about 3 years before the goal, especially if you’re sitting on good returns after a bull phase.

If we can avoid falls like December 2007 to February 2009 by exiting before, our results would be so much better. Should we sell in mass panic scenarios and re-enter when the mayhem is over?

It would indeed be great if we could sell on the eve of major market crashes and re-enter just when a rally is about to begin. But both market crashes and rebounds can be very hard to predict. Yes, one can use a combination of valuation-based indicators (index PE, price to book value) and behavioural indicators (retail flows into funds, demat account openings, VIX levels, layman involvement in stock markets, IPO launches and subscription numbers) to gauge whether the market is a euphoric phase or a pessimistic phase. 

But then euphoric phases based on these indicators can stretch on for really long, as the current bull market has shown. Folks who looked at the traditional Nifty PE metric to exit equities in early 2015 have lost out on a 70% plus upside in the index. 
Even if one manages to sell at a market top, re-entering at the bottom can prove daunting. When markets correct, there are always plenty of naysayers predicting further gloom and doom. If you exit after the panic selling begins, you may be caught by surprise at how quickly a panic selling phase transforms into a bargain-hunting one where stocks begin to leap many percentage points in a few sessions. 

In fact, rebounds from sharp corrections always tend to be characterized by sharp short-covering rallies which eventually turn into the beginning of the next bull market. If you’ve exited stocks during panic selling, it can be nearly impossible to get back into them before such a rebound materializes. Folks who’ve lived through market bottoms of March 2009 and March 2020 can confirm this!

How do we identify when a sector is out of favor to make a contrarian bet?

Look for persisting negative headlines about the sector in the media, falling trends in FII and MF ownership and poor quarterly financial performance.

Different styles outperform at different stages of the stock market cycle. So why should one not switch between styles to make the most of every cycle?

This would call for great skills at predicting economic and business cycles which very few investors can boast of. Usually, growth investing outperforms in a continuing bull market. Value investing outperforms when a correction sets in and during the rebound from a sharp correction or a prolonged bear market. Momentum investing does well when a bullish trend goes undisturbed for a while. To know which style will outperform you will need to know whether you are currently at the start of a new bull phase, a continuing one or the end of one. IF you knew that you might as well take cash calls to maximize your portfolio returns instead of switching styles.

What’s the best way to hold cash while you’re waiting for a buying opportunity?

It is best to hold the cash in avenues that will assure capital safety and allow you to withdraw your money within the same day. Bank fixed deposits with leading banks that allow immediate online liquidation and investments in ultra-short/liquid funds with high quality portfolios fit the bill.

How do rising bond yields impact stocks?

Rising bond yields are negative for stock prices. The yield on bonds, especially government bonds, decides the returns that investors get to earn in an economy when they take no risk to their capital.  The returns that investors demand from risky assets like equities are therefore pegged to a certain premium over this risk-free rate. When bond yields rise, the returns that investors demand to buy stocks goes up. 

A higher return expectation from stocks means that investors would seek to buy stocks at a lower valuation than before, leading to selling pressure on stock prices. To put it more simply, assume you’re getting a 6% return from a 10-year government security today, you may be willing to buy stocks for 11 or 12% return expectation, given their higher risk of capital losses. But should the government security yield rise to 8%, you’d begin to question whether you should own stocks at all, and you may sell some of your stocks and buy bonds. Even those who buy stocks would now seek a 13-14% return from them. This would require them to buy stocks at lower prices than today. This is the theoretical reason why rising yields lead to sell-offs in stocks. 

Practically speaking, higher bond yields also lead to higher borrowing costs for companies which reduce their earnings and thus their attractiveness to equity investors. Higher bond yields reduce margins for investors who make leveraged trades. Foreign investors who are today borrowing at near zero rates in the Western world to invest in emerging market equities will find it less lucrative to do this, should bond yields in those countries rise.

With stock prices falling due to rising bond yields, is it a good time to invest in equities?

As the above answer explains, rising bond yields weaken the case for you to own equities. Today, bond yields are rising from abnormally low interest rates that are at their lowest levels in known history. Therefore, there could be a lot of room for yields to rise from current levels, during which period equities could be steadily de-rated. However, while the inverse relationship between bond yields and stock prices holds good for the market as a whole, there could be individual stocks that are attractive to own because they offer scope for returns that compensate for the risks of owning equities.

Related Articles

Contents

Need Support?

Can't find the answer you're looking for?
Contact Support
Login to your account
OR