What are accrual and duration strategies in debt – Part II

Share on whatsapp
Share via Whatsapp
Share on twitter
Tweet it out
Share on facebook
Share on FB
Share on linkedin
Post on LinkedIn

Last week, we explained what an accrual strategy is, in debt funds. We talked about how you can identify if a fund follows such a strategy and how to use such funds. The second main strategy that debt funds follow is duration. In this article, we’ll cover what a duration strategy in debt funds is, which categories follow duration, and whether you should invest in such funds.

duration strategy in debt funds

The price-yield relationship

The yield of a bond is a function of its price and the coupon (interest rate) it bears. If the bond’s price rises, the yield of the bond falls. If the bond’s price falls, the yield rises.

Now, consider interest rates. When interest rates fall, the bonds that were issued earlier (before the rate fall) will have a comparatively higher coupon. There’s a scramble for these bonds as they’re more attractive. Bond prices will rise as a result. Theoretically, the gains will be such that the bond’s yield eventually equals the new interest rate. Purely from an illustrative angle, consider a 10-year bond with a 7% coupon trading at Rs 1000. If interest rates fall to 6%, the bond’s price will climb to about Rs 1073, at which point the yields will be more or less the same as the new interest rate. Conversely, should interest rates rise, the current bond’s price will fall. And that means the current bond’s yields will go up.

When a fund follows a duration strategy, it is trying to adjust the maturity of the papers it holds based on the stage of the interest rate cycle.

What is a duration strategy?

How does this translate into fund strategies? Different bonds have different maturities and coupon. A bond’s maturity plays a role in how sensitive it is to changes in interest rates. Typically, longer-term bonds are more sensitive and shorter-term bonds less so. Why?

Simply because in the long term, there’s a risk attached to both changes in interest rates and/or credit worthiness. By sensitive, what we mean is the extent of the price gain for every fall in interest rate or the extent of price fall for every rise in the interest rate. A more sensitive bond gains more and loses more compared to a less sensitive bond.

In a rate fall scenario, a longer dated bond, which was issued earlier will provide higher coupon (interest income) for a longer residual period. That means its demand will be higher and so its price rallies more. The converse is true when rates go up. A longer maturing bond that was issued earlier at a lower rate will deliver lower coupon for the rest of its life and will therefore fall more to adjust to the new rate.

So when a fund follows a duration strategy, it is trying to adjust the maturity of the papers it holds based on the stage of the interest rate cycle. These funds take a call on the direction interest rates are headed and build their portfolio to reflect that direction.

In falling rate cycles, a fund with a duration strategy will go for long-maturity bonds to profit off the bond price rise. When rates rise, the fund will typically go for shorter maturity bonds as coupon will be attractive here and will simply make gains off accruing the interest.

Longer-term bonds are more sensitive and shorter-term bonds less so. In a rate fall scenario, a longer dated bond issued earlier will provide higher interest income for a longer residual period and so rallies more.

Identifying a duration strategy

So how do you know if a fund is duration or accrual? We’ve covered the latter question in our article on accrual. On the duration side, the following will help you realise fund strategy:

  • For funds to make gains off bond price rallies, the bonds need to be liquid and traded. This is best found in government securities (gilts) and next in AAA-rated and a good number of PSU bonds. When a fund predicts a fall in interest rates, it will primarily buy into long-term gilts. So if you see a fund loading up on gilts, you know it is trying to make profits off a duration strategy. For example, Kotak Dynamic Bond went from 18% in gilts in August 2019 to 43% now.
  • Funds that are purely duration based will see portfolio maturities swing by a wide margin. When we say purely duration, we mean that the fund’s main strategy is to take calls on the rate direction and adjust portfolio accordingly. Maturities change quickly because funds can push the bulk of their portfolio into long-dated papers when rates fall, and then shift out and into short maturity bonds when the rate cycle moves up. The shifts in maturity can change widely even over the course of a few months or a few years. These are typically dynamic bond funds, long duration funds, and gilt funds (but note that the ability to shift maturity is restricted in some categories. More on this in the section on pros and cons of duration). To continue with Kotak Dynamic, the fund’s average maturity swung from less than 4 years in 2018 to 5-6 years in 2019. In 2020, it has been anywhere between 5 and 8 years. In another example, Tata Dynamic jumped from 2 years in mid-2019 to 6 years a couple months later to less than 5 years in the next few months and close to 10 years now. The graph below shows how portfolio maturities have changed for the dynamic bond fund category and gilt category.
  • Funds that mix both accrual and duration, such as corporate bond funds, medium duration, short duration funds, and banking & PSU debt see less swings in maturity. These funds also tend to use AAA and PSU bonds more than  gilts to profit off rallies, unlike dynamic bond funds which rely much more on gilts. Medium to long duration funds also fall into this accrual-plus-duration mix. For example, while corporate bond funds on an average had about 10-17% of their portfolio in gilts over the past six months, dynamic bond funds had over half their portfolios in gilt. Categories such as corporate bond primarily follow accrual strategy but will try to make profits on the side when rates fall.
  • In a pure duration strategy, portfolio yields will not be the right metric to look at. Portfolio yields can be low during falling rate cycles as the yields on the underlying instruments fall. The real gain comes from the appreciation in the price of the gilts/bonds that the fund holds.
  • In pure duration strategies, the volatility in returns will be higher whether you’re looking a 1-month period or a 6-month period or a 1-year period compared to funds that follow an accrual strategy. By volatility, we mean the fluctuation or the deviation in returns. Duration strategies can result in losses. More on that in the next section.

To summarise, dynamic bond funds, gilt funds and long-duration funds are the ones you can expect to follow a duration strategy. Corporate bond funds, medium duration, medium-to-long duration, short duration funds, and banking & PSU debt funds use accrual as their main strategy but will repurpose their AAA-bonds and use some gilts to book bigger gains when rates fall.

The pros and cons

If you see the 1-year returns for dynamic bond funds, gilt funds, or long duration funds, they are around 8.5-10%. Corporate bond, banking & PSU debt, short duration are at similar levels. This is primarily because of duration calls playing right.

Pro#1: Duration calls can help shore up gains when rates fall.

Falling rates will reduce accrual income. So by locking into bond price rallies when rates are cut, funds can still deliver returns when they follow a duration strategy.

Pro#2: Duration calls can deliver much higher returns than accrual in a favourable scenario.

Bond price gains, which translate into NAV gains, can be very sharp. For example, 1-year returns in some gilt funds have even moved above 20% late last year. So if you time your investment right, you could stand to make substantial gains in even your debt investment.

Which, of course, brings us to the cons – most important of which is that timing is key.

Con#1: Duration calls can go wrong.

Making profits off a duration strategy needs falling rates. This is a factor of RBI action, market perception of inflation, economic growth, government borrowing, corporate credit standings, and liquidity. Getting rate calls right is not easy, and if such a call goes wrong and a fund increases duration, it can lead to suppressed gains. Reversing calls can be equally tricky.

We saw this through 2017, where there was a lot of uncertainty over rate direction and funds that went long and stayed there posted poor returns. Similarly, if a fund does not move into accrual before the rate cycle turns up, it could wipe out the gains made already. And these calls between duration and accrual need to be done consistently, over the years.

Con#2: Returns will be volatile and more unpredictable.

Since a duration strategy is based on bond price potential, returns can be volatile and losses are well possible even on a 1-year basis. Gilt funds, for example, have been loss-making in 1-year periods about 4% of the time since 2012. They have delivered less than 5% a fifth of the time on 1-year periods, but at the same time delivered 9%-plus returns about half the time. Returns can also be low if the fund sticks to either duration or accrual to wait for the cycle to turn and the call to pay off. The table below shows the percentage of times the dynamic bond fund category and the gilt fund category generated losses in 1-month, 3-month, 6-month and 1-year periods from Sept 2015 to Sept 2020.

Con#3: Some fund categories won’t be able to shift duration easily.

Dynamic bond funds change durations to suit the rate cycle. So when interest rates are rising or high, they can move into shorter-term bonds and benefit from normal interest accrual. So theoretically, they can maintain performance across rate cycles – provided they get both duration and accrual calls correctly. But for gilt funds, while they can cut maturity short, they are still restricted in that they will need to hold only gilts. Therefore, during rising rate cycles, gilt funds can see low accrual. Long duration funds are even more restricted, because they have to necessarily maintain an average portfolio duration of 7 years. The other fund categories, being primarily accrual, have a lot more freedom to benefit from higher interest rates.

Using duration funds

So how do you put the pros and cons together to know if you should invest in such funds? As we did with accrual funds in our earlier artile we’ll look at it from a timeframe, returns, and income perspective.

Time frame

Duration strategies are good only if you have a long-term timeframe of at least 3-4 years, and longer if you are going for gilt funds. This is because in the short-term, one, these funds can see poor returns. Two, volatility is higher and evens out only over time. Three, the long period gives time for funds to course-correct if they take wrong interest rate calls. Four, categories such as dynamic bond funds can also take credit calls when they shift to accrual and their portfolios can sport low-rated papers. This adds another layer of risk, which should be avoided in the short term.

This is why you will find gilt funds and dynamic bond funds, if any, only in our long-term section in Prime Funds. If you are able to time your investments based on the rate cycle, then you can have a shorter timeframe.

If you cannot handle volatility in your funds or the prospect of losses in a 1-month, 6-month or 1-year timeframe or low returns for longer 1-2 year periods, you should stay away from pure duration funds like dynamic bond, gilts, and long duration funds. Go for accrual funds as explained in the article on accrual.


The two tables below, reproduced from the article on accrual strategy, show the returns in the past few years for different fund categories.

While 1-year returns can shoot into the double digits, over time, you cannot expect the same to hold for longer periods. These high returns tend to normalise over time across rising and falling rate cycles. However, returns still do beat FDs and especially on a post-tax basis. Given that the interest rates have gone through multiple rises and cuts in the past 4 years, recent returns for gilt and dynamic bond funds look far more attractive than accrual funds. This may not hold in the coming years.  

If you are comfortable with return volatility, then you can consider dynamic bond funds and gilt funds. Holding dynamic bonds alone can, however, be avoided given that they have both credit risk and duration risk. Use these funds along with high credit quality accrual funds. We’d suggest avoiding long duration funds (SEBI category) simply for the reason that they do not have the duration freedom that other categories do.


Duration strategies cannot be used to generate steady income through systematic withdrawal. Given the potential for losses in these funds and their volatility you may inadvertently wind up selling when returns are poor. If your income requirement and investible capital allows you to set aside a sum for at least 5 years, you can consider using gilt funds. Systematically withdrawing them post such a period will impact your portfolio less, even if your withdrawal happens in adverse rate conditions.

Share on whatsapp
Share via Whatsapp
Share on twitter
Tweet it out
Share on facebook
Share on FB
Share on linkedin
Post on LinkedIn

Please note that any specific queries on any of our recommendations will be answered ONLY through email. If you are a subscriber, please mail contact@primeinvestor.in.  Only general queries or discussions will be answered through the comment section of the blog. For full details, please refer to this post – How to communicate with PrimeInvestor.

14 thoughts on “What are accrual and duration strategies in debt – Part II”

  1. How does the duration strategy affect an investor who invests lumpsum amount ? A SIP investor can cover for the rise and fall in interest rates. But, if someone invests lumpsum at a time when the fund makes an incorrect call on the interest rate, the investor end up losing.
    Does it mean duration strategy funds are not good for investing lumpsum amounts?

    1. Hello sir,

      If you’re entering funds to make money off duration then timing is important. But if you invest with a long-term holding – whether dynamic bond or gilt – then lump-sum vs SIP does not matter. And given that there can be losses if the rate call takes time to play out, it is best not to get into these funds with a short-term view. It’s explained here: https://primeinvestor.in/should-you-run-an-sip-in-debt-funds-or-in-lumpsum/


  2. Satya Sudhakarudu Jonnalagadda

    Respected Madam,

    Concept of duration and the relationship between yield and interest movement is well explained.

    Thank you very much.


Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Register for FREE!

Gain instant access to more PrimeInvestor articles, researched products, and portfolios

The essence of PrimeInvestor

Register for FREE!

Gain instant access to more PrimeInvestor articles, researched products, and portfolios

Legal Disclaimer : Redwood Research (with brand name PrimeInvestor) is an independent research entity offering research services on personal finance products to customers. We are a SEBI registered Research Analyst (Registration: INH200007478). The content and reports generated by the entity does not constitute or is not intended to constitute an offer to buy or sell, or a solicitation to an offer to buy or sell financial products, units or securities. All content and information is provided on an ‘As Is’ basis by PrimeInvestor. Information herein is believed to be reliable but PrimeInvestor does not warrant its completeness or accuracy and expressly disclaims all warranties and conditions of any kind, whether express or implied. The services rendered by PrimeInvestor are on a best effort basis. PrimeInvestor does not assure or guarantee the user any minimum or fixed returns. PrimeInvestor or any of its officers, directors, partners, employees, agents, subsidiaries, affiliates or business associates will not liable for any losses, cost of damage incurred consequent upon relying on investment information, research opinions or advice or any other material/information whatsoever on the web site, reports, mails or notifications issued by PrimeInvestor or any other agency appointed/authorised by PrimeInvestor. Use of the above-said information is at the user’s own risk. The user must make his own investment decisions based on his specific investment objective and financial position and using such independent advisors as he believes necessary. All intellectual property rights emerging from this website, blog, and investment solutions are and shall remain with PrimeInvestor. All material made available is meant for the user’s personal use and such user shall not resell, copy, or redistribute the newsletter or any part of it, or use it for any commercial purpose. PrimeInvestor, or any of its officers, directors, employees, or subsidiaries have not received any compensation/ benefits whether monetary or in kind, from the AMC, company, government, bank or any other product manufacturer or third party, whose products are the subject of its research or investment information. The performance data quoted represents past performance and does not guarantee future results. Investing in financial products involves risk. Mutual Fund Investments are subject to market risk, read all scheme related documents carefully. As a condition to accessing PrimeInvestor’s content and website, you agree to our Terms and Conditions of Use, available here. This service is not directed for access or use by anyone in a country, especially, USA, Canada or the European Union countries, where such use or access is unlawful or which may subject Redwood Research or its affiliates to any registration or licensing requirement.

• Aditya Birla Mutual Fund • Axis Mutual Fund • Baroda Mutual Fund • BNP Paribas Mutual Fund • BOI AXA Mutual Funds • Canara Robeco Mutual Fund • DSP Mutual Fund • Edelweiss Mutual Fund • Essel Mutual Fund • Franklin Templeton Mutual Fund • HDFC Mutual Fund • HSBC Mutual Fund • ICICI Mutual Fund • IDBI Mutual Fund • IDFC Mutual Fund • IIFL Mutual Fund • Indiabulls Mutual Fund • Invesco Mutual Fund • ITI Mutual Fund • Kotak Mahindra Mutual Fund • L&T Mutual Fund • LIC Mutual Fund • Mahindra Mutual Fund • Mirae Asset Mutual Fund • Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund • Nippon India Mutual Fund • PGIM Mutual Fund • PPFAS Mutual Fund • Principal Mutual Fund • Quant Mutual Fund • Quantum Mutual Fund • Sahara Mutual Fund • SBI Mutual Fund • Shriram Mutual Fund • Sundaram Mutual Fund • Tata Mutual Funds • Taurus Mutual Funds • Union Mutual Funds • UTI Mutual Funds • Yes Mutual Funds

Equity: Large Cap Funds | Mip Cap Funds | Large And Mid Cap Funds | Small Cap Mutual Funds | Contra Mutual Funds | Dividend Yield | Focused Mutual Funds | Find Top Index Funds | Best Sector Funds | Thematic Mutual Fund | Best Value Mutual Funds | Equity Linked Savings Scheme | Tax Saving Funds
Debt: Banking And PSU Funds | Corporate Bond Funds | Credit Risk Funds Mutual Funds | Dynamic Bond Funds | Floating Rate Funds | Gilt Mutual Funds India | Find Top Liquid Funds In India | Long term debt funds | Low Duration Funds Debt Funds | Medium Duration Debt Funds | Medium To Long Duration Funds | Money Market Debt Funds | Overnight Debt Funds | Short Duration Debt Funds | Ultra Short Term Debt Fund
Hybrid: Aggressive Hybrid Funds | Arbitrage Mutual Funds | Balanced Advantage Mutual Funds | Conservative Hybrid Funds | Dynamic Asset Allocation | Equity Saving Funds | Multi Asset Funds | Multi Asset Allocation

Login to your account