Changes in our FD strategy and new FD recommendations

“When facts change, it is best to change your mind.” It is not clear if this pragmatic statement was made by John Maynard Keynes or Winston Churchill. But it definitely applies to the world of investing where one needs to scout for the best opportunities after factoring in constantly changing asset prices, interest rates, macroeconomic conditions and regulations.

Three recent changes

In this review, our new FD recommendations in Prime Deposits are based on changed FD strategy. Our FD strategy change was triggered by three recent changes we saw in the macro/regulatory environment.

#1 Deposit insurance overhaul

India’s ineffective deposit insurance laws have undergone significant changes recently, with the DICGC (Deposit Insurance and Credit Guarantee Corporation) Amendment Act 2021 taking effect from September 1. You can find a more detailed explanation of this changed law in our earlier article. 

Briefly, this law allows deposit insurance to kick in the moment a bank is put under ‘directions’ restricting withdrawals by RBI. It places the onus of insurance payouts on the DICGC and it sets a deadline of 90 days for DICGC to make these payouts. These changes give bank depositors greater confidence that the insurance cover of Rs 5 lakh per depositor in the case of banks running into financial trouble, will work more effectively from here on.

#2 Privatization drive

After regularly supporting them with recapitalization in the last few years, the Centre of late seems determined to cut its apron strings with Public Sector Banks (PSBs) as a part of its privatization drive. The policy regime is also being readied for the Centre to dilute its stakes in PSBs with an intent to restrict its majority ownership to just a few.  It has already been staying off capital infusions and asking PSBs to resort to market issuances to shore up their capital.

This argues for breaking away from the perception that PSBs are always ‘safer’ places to deposit your money than private banks. It also puts FDs with public sector and private sector commercial banks, co-operative banks, small finance banks and regional rural banks on an equal footing when it comes to the extent of protection they offer their depositors. Should the bank flounder or come under RBI directions, depositors should expect to receive only Rs 5 lakh across all types of accounts he/she holds in the bank. Sums in excess of this, whether parked with PSBs or private banks or UCBs, may be only partly recovered based on the resolution process. 

With this shift, there’s nothing to stop investors from looking beyond PSBs or systemically important banks to improve the returns on their deposits.

#3 Rates in limbo

On the macro front, while inflation – both global and Indian – is proving sticky, monetary authorities around the world are determined to ignore it and are dragging their feet on raising interest rates. India has been no exception, with RBI and MPC repeatedly refraining from raising policy rates and going with an ‘accommodative’ stance in their policy reviews. Additionally, RBI has been resorting to several artificial means (G-SAP being one) to keep g-sec yields low so that government borrowing costs remain under check. This has been delaying the inevitable rise in market interest rates, putting fixed income investors in a limbo. 

As a result, while all conditions are in place for interest rates to rise, there’s a complete lack of clarity on when they will rise. This argues for minimizing the lock-in period on your term deposits, or going for deposit options with premature withdrawal facilities, so that you can capitalize on any rise in rates as and when it materializes. We recommend staying with 1 or 2-year deposit options right now.

Change in choices

The above factors have implications for the way you should go about selecting your FD options. Here’s how we suggest you approach them now. 

As we explained above, recent deposit insurance changes open up investing opportunities for depositors across small finance banks (SFBs), new private sector banks and urban co-operative banks, which usually offer higher rates than PSBs or systemically important ones. How do you choose between these categories?

#1 Avoid UCBs

One, we recommend that in your hunt for better rates, you avoid the temptations of urban co-operative banks (UCBs) and go for small finance banks (SFBs). 

After the string of co-operative bank failures in recent years which have brought to light their lax governance, politically connected management and doubtful lending practices, there has been a concerted regulatory push towards moving these banks into the RBI fold and loosening the State governments’ grip over them. There is also a move to raise the bar on prudential norms for UCBs, so that they either consolidate or convert to the tightly regulated Small Finance Banks. However, with over 1544 co-operative banks moved into the RBI fold, it is doubtful if RBI will be able to immediately step-up supervision of these banks and whip them into shape. 

RBI may instead push for such banks to merge with each other or get taken over by healthier mainstream banks. With UCBs likely to be under regulatory pressure, depositors who seek them out for better rates are bound to face considerable uncertainty with regard to safety of their capital. The fact that UCBs are unlisted and not subject to the stringent quarterly disclosure norms of other listed commercial banks or small finance banks also prevent investors from getting early warning of impending trouble. 

Yes, should such banks land in financial trouble or RBI pass directions on them, depositors will become eligible to receive insurance payouts upto Rs 5 lakh. But RBI may be cautious about placing too many UCBs under such restrictions given the DICGC’s limited ability to meet bunched up claims. This situation makes co-operative banks a very dicey bet still, for investors seeking worry-free deposits.

#2 SFBs score

SFBs, specialized banks that lend to riskier, small-ticket borrowers are relatively new kids on block in the banking space, but subject to very tight regulations with Rs 200 crore minimum net worth requirement, higher capital adequacy ratio of 15 % (versus 9% for commercial banks) and the requirement of mandatory listing if these banks cross Rs 500 crore minimum net worth.  Being of relatively recent origin, these banks’ books are usually free of the baggage of legacy bad loans that UCBs or PSBs carry. 

Yes, the default risks in SFB loans books have been rising post-Covid as their smaller-ticket borrowers have borne the brunt of the income and job losses brought on by the pandemic. The financial disclosures and granular loan book details these banks share every quarter include loan book, NPS situation, provision coverage and capital infusion cushions to absorb loan losses. These make it possible for investors to identify problems early and choose the better-placed SFBs. With the lifting of Covid related forbearance on NPA recognition, the published accounts of these banks have begun to reflect the quality of their loan books more realistically since the March quarter of FY22.

#3 No PSB preference

Earlier, depositors bet on deposits with PSU banks based on the vague belief that PSBs were ‘safer’ than private banks because they had ‘sovereign backing’. This allowed PSBs with double-digit NPA ratios, those under RBI’s PCA and those with capital adequacy ratios barely meeting the 9% norm to offer relatively low rates and still attract deposits. But this could change with the Centre announcing its intent of cutting PSB apron strings. 

The hike in deposit insurance cover to Rs 5 lakh per depositor per bank also allows the Centre to treat all banks, PSBs included, alike when it comes to settling depositor claims. Therefore, investors can now choose their FDs based on the rates offered and financial strengths of individual banks, rather than going by their public or private ownership. If you find a new or relatively small private sector bank offering better deposit rates and great service compared to a PSB, you can run a check on its financial parameters and go in for its FD.

#4 NBFCs less attractive

With the clean-up of the deposit insurance framework and the hike in deposit insurance limits, deposits with banks now enjoy protection upto Rs 5 lakh per depositor even if the bank flounders or runs into financial stress. With NBFCs though, there is no such protection as they are not covered by the deposit insurance framework. This apart, the recent resolution plan for DHFL the failed housing finance giant, has put FD holders last in the pecking order of creditors eligible for partial recoveries. 

In the DHFL case while NCD holders with upto a Rs 2 lakh investment are set to receive their claims in full and holders beyond that are set to receive 43% of their claims, FD holder as unsecured creditors are set to get only 23%, with no distinction between large and small depositors. 

These two factors suggest that depositors need to be extremely careful in subscribing to deposit programmes from NBFCs. Yes, top-rated NBFCs with a long legacy of servicing FDs like Sundaram Finance or HDFC do make the cut. But they would be appealing only if they offered higher rates than banks, which now offer assured principal safety upto Rs 5 lakh.

Our FD recommendations and a unique FD tool

Given that you no longer need to stick to a handful of PSBs or systemically important banks for your deposits, how do you go about choosing the best banks for FDs?

While it may be tempting to just go for the ones with the highest rates, it is never a good idea to choose an investment option based on returns alone without considering the risks that go with it. To balance between risk and reward (and avoid uncertainties that go with a bank actually getting into trouble and needing insurance payouts), you should be looking for banks that combine sound financials with competitive rates. 

To assess if a bank is sound or not, it is useful to run a check on latest size of its deposit base, recent deposit growth, CRAR ratio, GNPA and NNPA ratios, systemic importance and whether it is under RBI’s PCA framework.  

Compiling such data every quarter can be a tough task for a depositor, prompting us to offer you two unique products: 

• FD recommendations using Prime Deposits: You can simply go straight to our Prime Deposits section and pick out our recommendations of the banks that match your investment tenure of 12 months or 24 months. We’ve already put the financials of these recommended banks under the microscope and have arrived at a trade-off between their risks and rates. We have made substantial changes to our list in our new FD recommendations. Do check them.
• Check your bank’s health with our FD Tool: If you like to do your own due diligence on a bank you find attractive, then you’ll love our brand-new Bank FD tool. This allows you to rank banks on key parameters that can help compare them to each other. For your convenience, not only have we compiled all relevant parameters of the banks from their latest quarterly results at one place, we’ve also offered our qualitative opinion on whether PrimeInvestor has High, Medium or Low confidence in these banks. Check this tool here: https://primeinvestor.in/bank-fd-tool/  and your task of choosing FDs will get infinitely simpler.  

While constructing your FD portfolio, don’t forget to follow these rules: 

• Park your emergency fund or windfall gains where you prioritize capital safety in post office schemes and systemically important banks. 
• Banks scoring ‘High’ on our confidence rankings should come next in your pecking order.
• Use FDs in SFBs or lower-rated banks as top-ups, to add a kicker to your returns from the above.
• Stick to 1 or at most 2-year tenures.
• Restrict your exposure to SFBs or banks ranked Medium or Low, to Rs 5 lakh per bank. This Rs 5 lakh limit is an umbrella limit that should apply to all types of accounts you hold in a bank- RDs, FDs, savings accounts – with both principal and interest being covered.