The concept of a ‘permanent portfolio’ has been gaining interest in the past few years, likely driven by the influx of new investors in the market who are looking for zero or low maintenance investment solutions. The term itself has meant different things and these different meanings have varying degrees of ‘permanence’ about each of them. Whether a portfolio will be permanent about its fund choices or asset balance or allocation depends on the degree of effort that an investor is willing to put in and the returns expectations that they have.
In this article, let’s explore this concept in some detail. We will look at the merits of building a permanent portfolio and how you can build/own one, if you feel it is right for you.
Do you need a permanent portfolio?
A portfolio that you don’t have to monitor has many advantages. But it is not necessary that you have one. You need one only if you fit into any of these below:
- You do not want to take the help of a fee-based advisor nor do you have the time to do your own homework to build and maintain your portfolio.
- You do not want the hassle of tracking fund performance and diligently weeding out poor performers and shifting to better ones, periodically.
- You do not want to deal with fund manager changes, fund closures, fund mergers, funds changing their objective/strategy, and funds suddenly shutting down without giving you notice!
- You do not want to be paying taxes every time to shuffle your portfolio.
- You simply do not like the idea of paying higher cost (expense ratio)
- You believe active investing will lose to passive investing with time, if not already.
- Importantly, you are not looking for ‘best returns’ and are happy with what the market delivers.
Is a permanent portfolio possible with active funds?
Many of you wish that we gave you a set of funds that you can hold forever. We wish we could too. Fund houses with a 20-25 year track record argue that their funds have delivered top notch performance over 20 years or more. Sadly, many such funds have languished in the performance charts in the last 5 years or more. We have even written about how some funds struggle to sustain performance with time and also why we were avoiding some of the iconic funds of yester years.
There are several reasons why a permanent portfolio is difficult to achieve with active funds. We have explained it in detail in an earlier article on why buy and hold is not a sound strategy with active MFs. But some of the common reasons why active funds find it hard to sustain performance over lengths of time is given below:
- One, there can be a fund manager exit that triggers a dip. Even if the new fund manager tries to stabilize performance, the wide margin of underperformance with peers, by then, makes it hard to play catch up. We have seen this in funds like IDFC Premier Equity.
- Two, fund managers take calls that go wrong or take a long time to perform. Those who reverse such calls quickly bounce back. Those that wait it out suffer. We have seen this in schemes of large fund houses such as Franklin India and HDFC Mutual when calls in banking or regulated sectors like telecom go wrong. Sometimes there is a belief (call it the gambler’s fallacy) that the bets that did not work will have to eventually work. This belief was not uncommon in PSU stocks.
- Three, the size of a fund can grow unwieldy to a point of difficulty in deployment of inflows. We have seen this in yesteryear top performance like Nippon India (earlier Reliance) Growth, Nippon India Vision. This is particularly true of mid and small-cap funds. We did see this playout in HDFC Midcap Opportunities and even HDFC Small Cap. Poor liquidity in the mid and small-cap segment means that funds cannot readily deploy the sums in one shot without impacting stock price. Likewise, they cannot exit at one shot, thus seeing a difference in the ‘book’ profits and ‘realized’ profits.
- Four, a fund can change its strategy either due to change in regulations or change due to its own internal rejig. For example, some midcap funds fitted themselves into the large & midcap space and others into flexicap space. This not only alters your return expectations but also the fund’s risk profile in your portfolio.
- Five, a changed market phase can bring an entirely new set of outperforming funds. The funds of pre-2008, never made the cut post 2008. Why? The strategy/theme that the fund rode in the previous decade did not repeat itself in the next decade. Funds that rode the infrastructure/cyclical themes underperformed in the post 2008 period as they could not readjust their portfolio in time for the next theme of defensives. It then becomes a case of too late to catch up.
We are not suggesting that an active portfolio is bad. We are just stating that for all the above reasons having a “permanent” buy and hold portfolio with active funds is difficult.
A permanent portfolio with passive funds
A portfolio made of passive funds solves many of the problems stated above. There is no fund manager or strategy change and there is no such thing as managing a fund’s size. This is truer when the underlying funds/ETFs are market-cap based. You will never have a problem of a mid-cap index becoming a largecap since the marketcap-based strategy will ensure that the large-caps are removed and emerging ones are added.
You’re not building a passive permanent portfolio hoping it will beat all active funds. You’re choosing them to simply stay with the market.
However, when you build a permanent portfolio with passive funds, you need to get these two points right:
- You’re not building a passive permanent portfolio hoping it will beat all active funds. You’re choosing them to simply stay with the market. Staying with the market can mean beating active funds at times and underperforming them other times.
- When you wish to follow the market, market-cap based index investing is a more fool-proof strategy then adding smart-beta or factor investing funds. The latter, if used, adds an element of ‘active allocation strategy’ to your portfolio. In other words, if you add a low volatility or a value strategy, you may not always sail with the market. You may underperform it in some phases. You need to ensure you mix such indices with those that counter these themes if you want to ensure a portfolio that performs across markets. So, it is desirable that a majority of your permanent portfolio has market-cap based index funds to keep it a real low-maintenance portfolio.
How to build a permanent portfolio?
Step1: Asset allocation
As is the case with most portfolios, a permanent portfolio too will need an initial asset allocation planning – choosing the right proportion of equity and debt fitting your time frame. You can take cues from our time-frame based portfolios (although the said portfolios are active) on how this can be done. Needless to say, when your time frame is less, your ability to take on equity funds will be reduced. Given below is a simple indicative table of what ranges your asset allocation can be at for different time frames. Do note that it is not a risk profiled allocation and should not be construed as advice. They are only broad indicators for you to build your portfolio. It does not also tell you if and when to rebalance.
Step 2: Index choices
The next thing would be the choice of funds itself under each asset class.
Let’s take debt first. With debt, you have 3 broad options in the market today. Liquid ETFs, pure gilt ETFs and PSU bonds and PSU bonds with state development loans. They are either ETFs or FoFs. Depending on your time frame, you could mix and match these. Today other than liquid ETFs and Bharat bond with 2-4 year tenure there aren’t that options in the very short to short term. The rest are all for a time frame of 5 years or more. So, you could simply keep it to liquid ETFs and not bother to deal with the volatility of the rest, if you plan on a simple portfolio.
Next, gold is available as ETFs or as gold funds. Gold can be a part of any long-term portfolio for the sake of diversification, if you do not already hold gold outside the fund route. Of course, you need to take cognizance of the minimum time frame you need to hold gold (see our asset allocation chart above). If you decide to add gold later, remember, it is not a substitute for debt. Reduce your equity component to add gold since gold is no longer a hedge in the sense of keeping volatility low. Gold has become highly volatile and helps you primarily in periods of poor equity performance.
It is desirable that a majority of your permanent portfolio has market-cap based index funds to keep it a real low-maintenance portfolio.
In equities, the choices are a lot more now than it was 5 years ago. We have discussed in detail in this article on how to build a portfolio with index funds (or ETFs). But in this, how simple you want to keep it and how complex you wish to go entirely depends on your time, ability and desire for higher returns. So let us break this down into various options in the order of simple to complex portfolios.
Option 1 – Single equity index portfolio: Simply holding a truly representative market-cap based index is the simplest and true-to-label permanent portfolio. In this, your equity should not extend to anything beyond the Nifty 50 or Nifty 100. After all, they represent over 80% of the market cap and ensure you ‘stay with the market’. The ideal thing would be for you to mix this index with a liquid fund. This option is ideal for those who want a super-simple approach and specifically for those who want a small component of equity. For example – if you want to hold just 10-15%in equity for say a 3-year time frame, then you can keep your equity allocation simple with Nifty 50.
Option 2 -Marketcap diversification: If you would like a little more diversification and enhance your returns, then your portfolio can be a mix of large cap, broad based (like the Next 50, Nifty 500 or BSE 500), midcap and small-cap indices.
Option 3- Add on indices: Indices that use various factors such as alpha, beta, value, low volatility or a combination of these are called factor indices or smart-beta indices. These indices bring in an element of management into your portfolio and increase ‘seasonality’ in performance. In other words, smart beta indices may underperform when broad markets outperform and vice-versa. For this reason, smart beta indices such as low volatility or alpha low volatility or value should not form a primary part of your portfolio. For example, if you have 70% in equities, then it is desirable to have least 50% in pure market-cap index-based funds.
Option 4 - Going international: To add further diversification or flavour, international funds can be considered. Keep it to passive investing here and keep it simple by sticking to US-focused options. Since the US markets are known to have relatively lower correlation with Indian markets and given that most other markets are less stable than the US, venturing into other markets will only increase the ‘active’ management component. Besides, as of now passive international funds available in India are only US-based.
We have summed up the above options here:
Step 3- Rebalancing
Now the all-important question of whether you should rebalance your portfolio – that is should you rejig your equity, debt or gold holdings periodically when one of them is inflated. This is a choice you can make. If you want utmost simplicity, then you can make this a true permanent portfolio without any kind of changes. That means even when your equity moves from, say,70% to 80% of your portfolio, you will not rejig it and bring it to 70%. This is quite ok if you are holding the most simplified portfolio with say a large-cap index and a liquid index (option 1). But where your holding gets a little more complex, with say midcap indices or global indices, then reviewing your portfolio annually is desirable. You can simply stick to checking if the allocation to any of the asset classes has gone out of sync and bring them back to the original levels.
Our permanent portfolios
We have long-term permanent portfolios through index funds and ETFs. You can check them here under the head ‘passive investing’. You can alter this to reduce equity if your time frame is lower than the minimum 5-7 year period we have suggested. You can also keep it simple to just Nifty and liquid ETFs as suggested earlier. If you wish to build your own permanent portfolio, you can also check our passive funds in Prime Funds and also our recommended ETFs.
27 thoughts on “How to build a permanent portfolio”
Thanks for the wonderful article.
1. Understand Nifty 50 helps weed out laggards but bring in better players. But can Passive portfolio such as Nifty 50/Nifty Next 5o underperform if the economy, as a whole, is underperforming? How to go about such scenarios? Historically, has equity underperformed other asset classes in the past?
2. In the index options, do not Gilt need some monitoring as interest hikes may have an impact in short term? Are you saying Gilt will be predictable in long term?
3. Are there default risks in SDLs or do they come with sovereign guarantee?
4. Rebalancing may also be required when one of the funds is re-rated. Right?
5. Challenge at this point is to generate a regular income with a permanent portfolio. Can the portfolio expand to include RBI bonds which may be a little more dependable income stream? Also please share your thoughts on how to go about it.
6. By international, can China be looked at as well? Any suggestions there? Understand Nasdaq 100.
1. Yes it has underperformed other asset classes MANY Times in the 1-3 year time frame. That is the natre of the asset class. The only way is to stay diversified at all times across asset classes.
2. Gilt does not need prediction if you are holding for long term..cycles normalise. Only short term needs caution (1-3 year period).
3.They have implicit sovereign gaurantee though not stated.
4. PLease search for our rebalancing article on when you need rebalancing.
5. Yes, it is difficult.You cannot have equity in a regular income portfolio unless you have held it for at least 5 years. RBI Bond can be a regular income option by itself.
6. We look at markets that complement India well. US works that way.
thanks, Vidya
Hello, some of the data tables in the article appear to be truncated. Can your team fix it, please?
Hello Sir, It looks fine. Perhaps try in a desktop or different browser? thanks, Vidya
Vidya ji I am your fan.
thank you real good information. I am 63 yrs, have made my own portfolio and am testing over different time frames on value research site. Investing in mf since may 2016. now i plan to slowly shift 4.5 cr in various mf to the plan below considering taxation n exit loads. this corpus is for pure growth for handing over to children. fair chance i will not need it.
hdfc sensex direct…….22%
uti nifty next direct… 22%
motilal midcap150…..22%
axis small cap……………09%
motilal nasdaq 100 …19%
hdfc gold fund…………..06
TOTAL 100% I have no knowledge of all the scary ratios. hope as per your article “Is this an almost repair proof long term portfolio” Please comment
Hello Sir, Thanks. You will appreciate this is strictly a portfolio building/review question and we are regulatorily constrained from responding to it as research analaysts. We will just suggest few things: next 50, small cap (which is not possive), midcap 150 and nasdaq are all a bit aggressive. So your portfolio is high risk. If that is fine by you. IT is no a repair proof portfolio as you have one active fund Axis Small cap. thanks,Vidya
Thank you Vidya ji.
Yes, I am clear about
1. small cap performance vs peers…may cause repair at some point
2. risk ..not feeling it bcoz of long investment period.
Anything else you would like to point out.
Should be good to go! thanks, Vidya
Thanks Ma’am for this article.
If I wish to compare my last 10 year SIP returns with Nifty 50 SIP (or any other index) returns (with exact same transactions on same days), how can I do that? Many times many advisors are not able to beat the Nifty returns with their own portfolio. In that case would it be better that an average person like me invests only Indices as advised in the article?
Hello Sir, You will need to do a XIRR for which you need to know the index levels at multiple points of your investment. Yes, you have a point. Except that in the Indian context, there are still active opportunities that do well. If it is too much to keep tab and make change, index investing makes sense. thanks, Vidya
Thanks for the detailed article.
Just a quick question which are the smart beta/multi factor indices that you are recommending?
It is available in our list of recommended ETFs. They are limited as many of them do not have sufficient volume. thanks, Vidya
Thank you.
Nice article ,
I would like to know more about Nippon India Passive flexi cap fund?
It is a basket of ETFs and index fund. Unfortunately unless a FoF has all its holdings in ETFs, it is taxed like a debt fund. Since one of the component (smallcap) is an index fund, this FoF has debt taxation. But for this, it is a good basket of multiple indices. thanks, Vidya
It would be great if you can provide a 1yr, 3r, 5 yr, 10yr returns data on your prime portfolios. It becomes easy for the user to take the decision when they look at the numbers.
Hello Sir, We wish we had that track record to do. W can’t possibly sport such returns when our portfolios did not have that record 🙂 We will soon provide 2- yr returns when we complete this year. thanks, Vidya
Excellent article !
It’s after some gap that an article on PI has been so thorough, detailed, well explained and thought provoking. Congratulations.
A couple of queries on Debt ETFs:
(1) How many options are there in Liquid ETFs (I know of Nippon and DSP – are there any others)? Are all of these on the LiquidBees like dividend pattern, or is there a growth option in any of the Liquid ETFs? I find the fractional units dividend system very complicated. I had a lot of trouble transferring these fractional units when I closed a Demat and wanted to move to another.
(2) Other than liquid ETFs and Bharat Bond, are their any good Debt ETF options like Nippon India G-Sec Long term ETF or others?
Thanks
‘after some gap’😃Compliment nevertheless 😊🙏
1. ICICI is one more. They are all the same.
2. Yes.
Nippon India ETF 5 Year Gilt
Nippon India ETF Long Term Gilt
Nippon India ETF Nifty CPSE Bond Plus SDL – 2024 Maturity
Nippon India ETF Nifty SDL 2026 Maturity
SBI ETF 10 year Gilt
IDFC’s debt index funds.
But the timing for most is not great.
thanks
Vidya
Instead of saying this as an eye opener, article sums up how to diversify the investment for passive investing and how many years to invest, in which funds depicts clarity altogether.
Thank you
Thanks! Vidya
Superb article with lot of clarity Vidya, Wish such advise and products were available 25 years back!!! Of lately I had started investing in Nifty 50, Nifty Next 50, Nifty Midcap 150, Gold and Nasdaq 100 ETF’s and a small cap Index fund on regular basis after reading your previous articles on passive investing . This was a timely article to reinforce it. Let me see how this style pans out in the future. Can you add the recommended debt ETF’s or passive debt FOF in the ETF recommendation section? This will aid in choosing the debt passive investments. Thanks
Hello Sir, Thanks! We have added one under theme/strategy in ETF. We will add more where we find opportunities. The FoF route is made available through portfolios. thanks, Vidya
Comments are closed.