The balanced advantage funds /dynamic asset allocation funds (BA/DAA) category was created after SEBI’s new categorisation rules. According to the rules these funds need to “invest in equity/debt that is managed dynamically”. However, there is a lack of any explanation on what funds in this category are meant to do. This article explores how these funds behave and what you need to consider before choosing them.
Allocations vary widely
When the BA/DAA category was created, funds that it housed were earlier either hybrid funds that blended equity-derivative-debt or hybrid funds that were supposed to dynamically alter asset allocation.
This resulted in the following aspects about this category:
- One, any distinction – if it existed – between ‘balanced advantage’ and ‘dynamic asset allocation’ is disappearing. Funds more or less maintain a 65% equity exposure (equity + derivatives) which makes taxation clear.
- Two, in the equity and derivative mix, funds differ very widely.
- Three, this differential means that returns between funds cannot be compared without considering each of their equity exposure.
Since then, these two seemingly different strategies more or less coalesced into a single general tendency. Namely – using a model or set of valuation indicators to identify attractiveness of the equity market. Based on these indicators, the fund fixes the extent of hedging through stock and index futures, the part of equity exposure to leave open, and debt. While the broad idea is the same across funds, in reality, it results in wide differentials.
#1 Funds follow their own model of equity and derivative allocation.
The role of derivatives is to counter equity markets – higher the hedged equity, lower the fund’s vulnerability to stock market movements. This split between hedged and unhedged equity varies very widely between funds.
Some are much more aggressive than others and undertake lower hedging. Others are very dynamic in extent of hedging. The lack of any strict definition leaves enough room for funds to follow any allocation they see fit.
For example, HDFC Balanced Advantage does no hedging at all and behaves like a hybrid aggressive fund. Aditya Birla SL Balanced Advantage can see months where derivative exposure is less than 10% or even nil and others where the exposure is over 30%. DSP Dynamic Asset Allocation is much more conservative with lower unhedged equity exposure.
Look at the table below. It shows the average open equity exposure for different funds in the category, the highest open equity exposure they had, and the lowest since July 2018 (the start of the recategorized period). Note that some funds of the funds were launched in 2019.
As you can see, the range of average equity exposures is very wide. Within each fund, the extent to which they get aggressive is also wide. Kotak Balanced Advantage, for example, can go very low to 30% in open equity and shoot as high as 74% at other times.
This points to the difference in strategies and models that each fund follows. The next table below shows the unhedged equity allocation in the six months between February and July this year for some key funds. This period is a good example of the variations in fund approaches, given the extreme volatility markets have seen.
In February, most funds were shying away from taking equity market bets, and were low on equity exposure. But by April and May, there was a marked difference in fund approaches – the ABSL and L&T funds got aggressive. The ICICI fund remained steady but still at a higher open equity allocation. The Edelweiss and DSP funds were much more conservative. Now move to July allocations, and you will see that there continues to be very different market bets between funds.
The point: Each balanced advantage fund uses different indicators to decide their equity, derivative, and debt allocations. This gives them varying degrees of risk, and will affect their returns especially in the shorter-term market volatility. It additionally makes comparison between funds tricky as it’s not really like-to-like.
#2 Returns and risk for funds are influenced by the allocations
Higher unhedged equity exposure makes those funds more volatile. It results in poorer ability to contain losses during market corrections. On the other hand, it can help deliver better returns over periods longer than 1 year.
Consider March this year. HDFC Balanced Advantage’s worst 1-month return in this period was a loss of 29%. Principal Balanced Advantage lost just 11.75% at its worst. Using the category average as a yardstick for downside capture, 40% of the funds clocked bigger losses during corrections than the category.
However, these funds also gained much more than the category during upswings. Consider all 1-year periods since January 2019 (to consider only the relevant periods post recategorisation). In this period, the highest return ICICI Pru Balanced Advantage posted was 14.5%. A much more sedate Axis Dynamic clocked a 10.6% highest gain.
The table below captures the average returns and volatility in returns from January 2019 to date.
Therefore, when looking at returns for balanced advantage fund, it becomes necessary to additionally look at where the returns are coming from. A high open equity allocation or a higher equity allocation in general will mean that a fund can deliver better returns, but will also be more volatile. On the debt front, though credit risk is not a glaring worry, funds such as ICICI Pru Balanced Advantage and Nippon India Balanced Advantage do hold lower-rated papers, primarily in the AA and AA- sets.
The point: Because each fund holds varying exposures to equity and derivatives, their return capacity and volatility will differ. In consequence, the risk level of each fund is very different.
How balanced advantage funds help
Balanced advantage funds straddle the gap between equity savings and aggressive hybrid.
- For a 1.5-3 year timeframe: Balanced advantage funds are more aggressive and have the potential to deliver higher returns than equity savings funds over periods longer than 1.5-2 years. For aggressive investors, they present a better alternative to pure debt funds for such timeframes. However, ensure that these funds are not the only component in your portfolio – use them in addition to pure debt funds. Conservative and moderate risk investors can stick to equity savings and pure debt funds.
- For a 3-5 year timeframe: Given their hedging and ability to adapt portfolios to market scenarios, balanced advantage funds do not fall as much as hybrid aggressive funds do. More, the hybrid aggressive category has been fading over the past couple of years; many have fallen more than large-cap equity funds in years such as 2018. Consistency in their performance is also taking a beating, and their portfolio strategies – such as moving into mid-caps for higher returns – require a longer holding period than 3 years. So in the place of these funds, you can opt for balanced advantage funds, across risk profiles, and blend them with debt funds and large-cap based funds for a diversified portfolio.
- For very long-term portfolios, if you are an aggressive investor and you wish to keep debt allocations lower than what is necessary, a balanced advantage fund can work well to fill the gap. They can help reduce portfolio volatility and to this extent play part of the role that debt does. So you can partly reduce debt exposure in favour of these funds. Ensure that you do not completely replace debt allocation – use balanced advantage funds along with debt funds.
Selecting balanced advantage funds
While this category is versatile, picking the best fund can get tricky because of the differences in each fund. So keep the following points in mind when looking at funds:
- Don’t compare returns without looking at underlying portfolio allocations.
- Have a clear objective before you choose a fund in the balanced advantage category. For example, if your aim is to hold a fund for dynamic asset allocation and it is for the long term, you would be okay with funds that vary their asset allocation by a wide margin as long as they deliver well across metrics. However, if you are using this category as a substitute for debt or for short-term horizons as explained above, you will do well to see if the fund hedges well or hedges at all. Some like HDFC Balanced Advantage don’t. You will also need to know whether the fund is more aggressive or conservative based on how much it hedges (and how much debt it moves into) on an average.
- Expense ratios can be a big differentiator between the direct and regular plans.
- At PrimeInvestor, we avoid funds that are very aggressive or extremely dynamic in this category. We think the intent of this category is to contain volatility and protect downsides on market corrections and we look for funds that can fulfill this role. This is unlikely to be the right segment to look for higher upside. You can use our Prime Funds or check our MF review tool for our view on funds you hold in this category.